PLEASE NOTE: We are still open and operational! To protect your safety in response to the threats of COVID-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in person, via telephone or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options. click here for Covid 19 updates
Laura Dale & Associates, P.C.

What is the acceptance of benefits doctrine?

If you and your spouse are a Texas couple seeking a divorce, you may not know about the acceptance of benefits doctrine. It could, however, become an important aspect of your divorce and its aftermath.

As pointed out by the Texas Supreme Court in the 2017 case of Kramer v. Kastleman, the acceptance of benefits doctrine says that no litigant can treat a court judgment as both right and wrong. Consequently, if you accept the benefits of your property settlement agreement, you cannot later challenge it unless you can show special circumstances.

Kramer background

During the nine-year marriage of Lisa Kramer and Bryan Kastleman, the couple’s marital estate ballooned to over $30 million. Prior to their divorce, they signed a property settlement agreement. The judge orally approved their settlement agreement and granted their divorce, but did not issue a written divorce decree until about a year later.

Prior to the issuance of the written decree, Ms. Kramer rescinded her agreement to the property settlement, claiming that Mr. Kastleman coerced her signature and committed fraud. She asked the judge to set the agreement aside. Mr. Kastleman countered that the agreement should remain as approved since Ms. Kramer had already received benefit from it, including $20,000 monthly rental from a piece of property that the agreement awarded to her.

The judge denied Ms. Kramer’s motion, awarded Mr. Kastleman approximately $32,000 in attorney’s fees, and issued its final divorce decree. Ms. Kramer appealed, but the appellate court dismissed her case, ruling that the acceptance of benefits doctrine prevented her from challenging the property settlement agreement. Again she appealed.

Supreme Court decision

The Texas Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and remanded the case to the original trial court judge. It reasoned that acceptance of benefits doctrine cases are fact-specific, in this particular case the judge approved the property settlement agreement long before issuing the final divorce decree, and Ms. Kramer did not have a clear intent to benefit from the agreement in the interim.

Based on this latest Texas case law addition, you would do well to make sure you really do agree to any property settlement you sign. Getting the agreement and your divorce decree that incorporates it set aside later can be quite challenging and there is no guarantee that you will prevail.

This is general information only and not intended to provide legal advice.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Board Certified
  • IAFL
  • Super Lawyers 2019
  • Best Lawyers
  • Avvo Rating
  • Avvo Rating
  • Avvo Client Choice 2014
  • Avvo Client Choice 2014
  • Best Law Firms Badge
  • Laura Dale
  • Texas Bar Today Top Ten Badge

Contact Our Experienced Team Today

Se Habla Español | Nous Parlons Français

Due to the experience our lawyers have in many specialized areas, you can rely on us to put together the right team to handle your case, even if it centers on complex issues such as international family law, business valuation or bankruptcy. Contact us today to make an appointment to discuss your needs with a knowledgeable lawyer.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Laura Dale & Associates, P.C.
email us for a response

1800 Saint James Place
Suite 620
Houston, TX 77056

Phone: 713-574-7952
Fax: 713-600-1718
Houston Law Office Map

Review Us